There no legitimate government interest in policing speech, because it is simply impossible for government not to take sides, and having government functionaries.unelected bureaucrats.choosing winners and losers is a recipe for disaster. When government enters into the arena of ideas, nothing good can come of it. ![]() It is a construct of post-modernism that seeks to carve out good and bad speech, and we all know which is which. But if you are so scared of my words that you must resort to the law to silence me, rather than the intellectual force of your disagreement, then that speaks volumes about your lack of intellect. If you don't like what I am saying, then please, refute it with your own words. The idea that there ought to be controls put in place to control speech should immediately offend all lovers of freedom and liberty. ![]() There is one answer to "hate speech," and that is more speech. While the issue of violent hate crimes cannot be minimized, the rush to enact potentially restrictive measures regarding online speech opens a Pandora's Box of censorship and surveillance that could, paradoxically, undermine the very freedoms civil rights leaders have fought to establish. The phrase "lethal threat of hate-motivated violence" was highlighted as a crisis needing immediate attention. The Anti-Defamation League, supported by well-known civil rights advocates, urged President Biden and VP Harris to create a robust plan targeting online hate, antisemitism, and extremism. A cursory glance at the last 100 years of European history should disabuse them of the notion that the left is anything other than a mortal enemy of Judaism, but that's okay with the ADL!ĪDL Calls on Biden and Harris To Create Directive To Tackle Online "Hate" Through Public-Private Partnership They have become an arm of the Democrat/progressive machine, and they are woefully ignorant of the real goals of that cabal. Anyone who does anything about "hate speech," or "speech," as I prefer to call it, is a fascist following in the footsteps of Stalin and Hitler and Mao and Castro and Pol Pot, and knows very well what the next steps will be.Īnd "Public-Private Partnership?" The last time I checked that was called.you guessed it.fascism, or National Socialism.take your pick.Īs for the ADL? They are a bunch of left-wing pseudo-Jews whose dedication to progressive ideals is far more important to them than their dedication to the Jewish people. Anyone who complains about "hate speech" is a budding totalitarian, and is after our freedom. ![]() "Hate" is progressive code for political speech that they do not like. We've got a Daily-Double of misguided and, frankly, evil ideas! And a bonus of the ADL continuing on its path to supporting exactly what it purports to fight. SeptemThe Morning Rant: Minimalist Edition
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |